https://opiej.mpob.gov.my Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:04:30 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://opiej.mpob.gov.my/comparative-analysis-of-oil-palm-in-field-collection-systems/ Mon, 11 Sep 2023 07:41:16 +0000 https://opiej.mpob.gov.my/?p=1803 Read more]]> The purpose of this study is to determine the most efficient system for the evacuation of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from the oil palm tree to the mill. The study employed a quantitative method by utilising primary data, gathered by randomly selecting 500 oil palm estates in Malaysia. A descriptive analysis was conducted to identify the most used system for the in-field collections. The efficiency of each system was then measured by dividing the total output of each system by its respective operating costs involved. The study found that most oil palm plantations in Malaysia are using the conventional way of evacuating oil palms to the mill (termed as System 1). However, System 1 was found to be inefficient because it requires a higher cost of operation to produce the same amount of FFB. The study found that System 2, in which the FFB was immediately transferred to the collection bin after being removed from the oil palm tree and sent directly to the palm oil mill, is the most effective. System 2 has the highest ratio of production compared to the other systems under consideration, producing 0.0213 t of FFB on average per month for every Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) spent.

]]> https://opiej.mpob.gov.my/prospects-of-elevating-national-oil-palm-productivity-a-malaysian-perspective/ Mon, 27 Aug 2018 08:27:13 +0000 http://palmoilis.mpob.gov.my/prototype/opiej/?p=106 Read more]]> The expansion of oil palm plantings has been phenomenal: from 60 000 ha in 1960 to 3.50 million hectares in 2001 and an expected 5.10 million hectares in 2020. The increase in palm oil production has accordingly reflected the pattern of the planted area, i.e. 91 793 t in 1960 to 11.80 million tonnes in 2001 and an expected 18.81 million tonnes in 2020. The national oil yield average does not seem to increase in step with the advances made in science and technology. The national oil yield average was 3.63 t/ha from 1975 to 2001, while the last 10-year average (1992-2001)was only 3.50 t/ha. This is very low indeed with no significant difference from other competing countries. Oil palm breeding has improved the planting materials. The oil yield of duras has improved from 2.8 to 4.5 t/ha after four selections. The oil yield of teneras from subsequent dura selections and introgression with selected pisiferas has improved from 6.3 to 11.2 t/ha in the last four decades. Why then is the national oil yield average still low? There can be many macro-reasons. Some reasons can be that with the rapid expansion of oil palm area, the limited areas of Class 1 and 2 soils have been used up and plantings have extended to Class 3 (marginal) and 4 (unsuitable) soils. Some other reasons may be inadequate agronomic inputs (especially fertilizer, field maintenance, etc.), shortage of skilled labour, ineffective and inadequate estate management, low replanting rate, and imbalance of extension service capability vis-‡-vis increases in oil palm plantings. These factors can lead to a combination of low fresh fruit bunch (FFB) yield and oil extraction rate (OER) which will eventually lead to low oil yield. There is a need to have strategies and a plan of action to overcome these constraints in order to increase the national oil yield average to the target of 8.8 t/ha by 2020. Implementation of short-term strategies can lead to an immediate increment in oil yield. However, it would need the implementation of medium- and long-term strategies to eventually lead to achieving the target. The incentive for the industry to follow these strategies will be an increase in yield with a sustained cost of production, thus making the industry more profitable and competitive.

]]>